So, how are we supposed to involve, to react, to lead to whatsoever in the community..?

Yes, for people like us who want to contribute to the ummah sincerely, may find that at times we are not sure that we are on the right tract.. 

How to react if your so called comrades suddenly highlight the issue  which seems to be conflicting like pluralism? or even liberalism?  say the ISSUE OF HUDUD  for example...

yes.. we are amongst the Islamic activists but we cant imposed our values to our nonmuslim comrades..

yes... we are aware of the notion..." let us start from our "common things" then what will happen if we are at the conflicting junctures? 




Quite often we will bump into our relatives who simply refuse to join  family events like tahlil, insist that female circumcision is haram and starts labelling people as "sesat"


Just sharing these 20 principles outlined by Islam as described by AlShaiykh Yusuf Qardawi in his book of 
Sakhsiyah Al-‘Am Al-Islamiyyah , 2000, Maktabah Wahbah, p.144.. and had been elaborated by Tan Sri Prof Kamal Hassan in his class..

i found it useful for us beginners at least to understand with the stands taken by certain Islamic movement when dealing with our recent "conflicts" in Malaysia... like the wahabi issues, mazhab issues, pleuralism issues, hudud etc....


I have classified them in accordance to level of individual, action ,  organisation for better understanding

**** AND WHAT BEING RECOMMENDED BY iSLAM IS to advocate the middle stance and balance between the two extremes... (AlBaqarah, 2:143)

Level	Area	Issues
Mindset	Halal walharam	Extreme in forbidding Exaggerate in permitting
	Reality	Ignores obstacles and dangers Overly pessimistic  and do not anticipate the break of dawn
	Reality	Absorb in the present matters without thinking of the future Talk about the future without dealing with present matters
	Result Orientation	Pick up before ripe enough Neglect even it is ripe and has fallen into the hands of others
	Fiqh (maqasid shari’ah)	Disregard the established reveal texts  by claiming in order to accommodate the maqasid shaariah Disregard the general objective of divine law (maqasid shaariah) in the name of accommodating the revealed text.
	Alkalam (aql) versus Annas	Those who use logic and aqal  even it goes against the conclusive nash(qati’e) Those who use nash only without referring to logic
	Fiqh :Tashaddud versus tasahul	Tashaddud in brances Tasahul even in the principles
	Mazhab	Strict adherence of jurisprudence school Loose adherence
	Tasawwuf and bidaah	Support tasawwuf despite in areas with clear innovation(bidaah) Oppose tasawwuf even in areas that are proper and abiding to shariah
Philosophy	Idealist versus realist	Idealists who hardly concern the reality Realist who do not believe or have in lofty moral ideals.
	Individualism and collectivism ( liberalism versus marxism)	Bestow the values of individual at the expense of society Bestow the values of society at the expense of society
Action	Level	Advocates worldwide without regarding local conditions and environment Advocates narrow regional actions with no global or world connection
	Organisation	Those who regard it as sacred and idolized it Totally abandon the need to work in organised manner
	politics	Expense of education ( tarbiyah) Focus on tarbiyah with total negligence of politics
	Organisation /individual	Extremism ( ghulluw) accussing others as kafir AlMutasahhilun over tolerance even in the matter of apostasy
	Organisation/individual	Advocates opening up to the world ( al-infithah) without any constraint Advocates of locking oneself in without justification
	Heritage	Regarded as sacred eventhough human failures are evident in it Disregards the heritage even it shows the signs of hidayah